Alex Rybakov vs Ilyas Milad Fahim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• The recent second serve success rates for both players are quite close: Fahim at 46.88% and Rybakov at 47.04%. Could this slight edge for Rybakov make a difference?
• Rybakov shows stronger return game stats, winning 46.64% of second serve points compared to Fahim’s 38.89%.
• For first serve returns, Rybakov again surpasses Fahim with a 25.71% success rate against Fahim’s 17.65%. This suggests an advantage for Rybakov in return games.
• Under pressure, Fahim exhibits remarkable efficiency, saving 91.67% of breakpoints. Conversely, Rybakov saves 52.4%, which might be exploited by strategically applied pressure.
• Rybakov boasts a superior match win rate over the past year at 66.67%, while Fahim stands at 43.75%. Does this indicate a more consistent performer in Rybakov?
• Surface preferences differ, with Fahim succeeding most on Clay at 45% and Rybakov excelling on Indoor Hard at 63%.
• Rybakov competes more frequently in higher-level tournaments with a 62.07% win rate, contrasting with Fahim’s 43.75%, often in lower-tier events. Does this imply greater adaptability and experience for Rybakov?
• Fahim has faced tougher opponents (average rank 268.38) compared to Rybakov’s matchups (average rank 406.39).
• In deciding sets, Rybakov edges out Fahim slightly with a 55% win rate versus 50%.
• Current event stats and specifics could influence this match; evaluating any ongoing performance might sway predictions.
• Rybakov significantly outperforms Fahim in break point conversion, converting 31.71% while Fahim has converted none recently.

Editorial Prediction (May 15, 2025, UTC):

As the match day approaches, the statistical insights highlight key areas where each player might shine.

Rybakov's slightly superior second serve performance and markedly better return game statistics suggest he may control more points against Fahim, potentially putting him in a favorable position.

While Fahim shows significant promise under pressure by saving breakpoints effectively, Rybakov’s higher break point conversion ability could capitalize on crucial opportunities.

Rybakov’s consistency across a higher level of tournament play and a stronger overall win record suggest he is more prepared for the challenge that this match presents.

In conclusion, based on the comparative analysis, Rybakov is most likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.